| dc.contributor.author | Чучко, Михайло Костянтинович | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chuchko, Mykhailo | |
| dc.contributor.author | Боднарюк, Богдан | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bodnariuk, Bohdan | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-08T07:08:40Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-09-08T07:08:40Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-09-25 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | HISTORY JOURNAL. OF YURIY FEDKOVYCH CHERNIVTSI NATIONAL UNIVERSITY | uk_UA |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2414-9012 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://archer.chnu.edu.ua/xmlui/handle/123456789/10485 | |
| dc.description | ЧНУ | uk_UA |
| dc.description.abstract | The article examines a range of issues related to the essential features and characteristics
of the definition of «event» in the temporal dimension, and also highlights the methodological symptoms
of the content of historical periodization in the context of its functional tasks. The authors focus on the
ambiguous and debatable problem of the research dichotomy – «event» and the temporal component from
the point of view of constructing the historical space of the past.
On the one hand, the event is studied as an element of historical analysis, on the other, the features of
the process of its integration into the plane of the temporal organization of history. In addition, the authors
consider the practical significance of what is happening at the level of basic chronological guidelines and
categorical definitions.
Another issue that is analyzed in the article is the modern understanding of historical narrative
through the prism of new methodological approaches and interpretive models, which are based on two doctrinal positions: the first – history studies the process of human development, which has a general logic
and direction, the second – this process is objective (in scientific sense) knowledge.
At the same time, the authors emphasize the social conditionality of historical knowledge, which is
understood primarily as aspects of an influential political situation and various ideological dominants.
Finally, in the article the authors raise the topic of the causes and consequences of global categorical
and conceptual «landslides» inherent in historical knowledge (historical opinion) of the 20th century.
The main one is that the history of events has been replaced by the history of interpretations. As a result,
the concept of «historical truth» has undergone partial methodological levelling and has lost a certain
scientific relevance.
As a result, the authors state the obviousness of the fact that event history in its «pure» form, which
is understood as the sequential «walk» of events in a single, logically justified, chronological and
causal connection, is quite conventional. It can be considered either as the simplest (elementary in its
descriptiveness) form of historical discourse, or, from a modern point of view, as one of the extreme degrees
of abstraction of historical analysis (in the dimension of subjective speculative constructions), since – within
linear chronological time – it is not possible, in particular, to interpret the history of culture, philosophical
or historiosophical doctrines (concepts), the history of collective ideas or the «history of the Other». | uk_UA |
| dc.description.sponsorship | ChNU | uk_UA |
| dc.publisher | Науковий вісник Чернівецького національного університету імені Юрія Федьковича: Історія. Чернівці: Чернівецький університет, 2024. № 1. С.147–155 | uk_UA |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | 1;59 | |
| dc.subject | methodology of history, methodological approaches, methodological problems, historical events, historical periodization, historical chronology, historical time, temporal representations, interpretation of events, narrative. | uk_UA |
| dc.title | ІСТОРИЧНІ ПОДІЇ ТА ЇХ ПЕРІОДИЗАЦІЯ У ЧАСОВОМУ ВИМІРІ: МЕТОДОЛОГІЧНА СИМПТОМАТИКА | uk_UA |
| dc.title.alternative | HISTORICAL EVENTS AND THEIR PERIODIZATION IN THE TIME DIMENSION: METHODOLOGICAL SYMPTOMATICS | uk_UA |
| dc.type | Article | uk_UA |
