Показати скорочений опис матеріалу

dc.contributor.authorDan Paranyuk, Serhiy Melenko
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-16T08:51:48Z
dc.date.available2021-11-16T08:51:48Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn2559-7671
dc.identifier.urihttps://archer.chnu.edu.ua/xmlui/handle/123456789/1058
dc.description.abstractBased on logical-gnoseological and axiological analyses, the article under studies presents an attempt of ontological research regarding the division of a wide range of human rights into absolute and relative ones. This article is a continuation of the authors’ investigation on scientifically substantiating the problem of determining some features that make it possible to find out, which group (absolute or relative) a certain human right belongs to, according to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms from 1950 (further – the Convention). The right to life and the right to absolute inviolability of the individual have been selected as the principal samples of this research. Taking into consideration the essence of certain cases, considered by the Strasbourg Court, as well as some other normative-legal acts, the authors of the article under discussion offer a few identification “markers”, which should lay the foundation of differentiating human rights. In addition, they question the present-day indisputable division of human rights into absolute and relative. Consequently, this article is of a rather debatable nature, since it aims at clarifying certain phenomena and notions in the field of the issue under investigation.uk_UA
dc.language.isoenuk_UA
dc.publisherLumenuk_UA
dc.subjectHuman rights; absolute and relative rights; the right to life; prohibition of tortures.uk_UA
dc.titleTo the issue of determining the criteria for differentiating human rights into absolute and relative.uk_UA
dc.typeArticleuk_UA


Долучені файли

Thumbnail

Даний матеріал зустрічається у наступних фондах

Показати скорочений опис матеріалу