| dc.contributor.author | Kozmuliak, Kateryna | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-02-17T14:56:11Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-02-17T14:56:11Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Козмуляк К.А. Медіація як спосіб врегулювання екологічних конфліктів. Екологічне право. 2021. № 1-4. С. 44-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37687/2413-7189.2021.1-4.7 | uk_UA |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2413-7189 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://archer.chnu.edu.ua/xmlui/handle/123456789/4100 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this article is to analyze the causes and to characterize some elements of environmental conflicts. The author’s aim is to justify the use of mediation as an effective way to resolve such conflicts. The article analyzes the subject and the object of environmental conflicts. It has been founded that such conflicts can arise both in public cases (in the field of strategic planning, distribution and redistribution of natural resources, realizing and protection of environmental rights) and in the private cases (in the field of a natural resource management).
The article justifies the expediency of using mediation as one of the most optimal methods of resolving such conflicts. The basic principles of mediation are analyzed and the criteria of mediability of ecological conflicts are named. The reasons that prevent the use of mediation in this area are identified. They are: a) the public health or safety requires an immediate response; b) the dispute concerns national security issues; c) the party of the conflict does not recognize the rights of the other one; d) the party that pays for the mediation insists on full control over the process; e) there are well-founded fears that mediation may be used in fraudulent faith to gather information or delay the resolution of a dispute; e) the parties take a fundamentally uncompromising position.
The article concludes that it is reasonable to fix the possibility of conducting mediation for the environmental conflicts settlement both in a private and a public sphere at the normative level. The author identified the issues that should to be resolved for the effective introduction of mediation in the Ukrainian legal system. They are: 1) the tools to encourage the parties to resolve the dispute through mediation; 2) the authority of the judge to adjourning or suspending the proceedings in order to give the parties time to contact the mediator and take part in the mediation; 3) the cases when mediation should be considered mandatory; 4) the duration of the mediation procedure; 5) the requirements to the mediation agreement based on the results of the conflict settlement | uk_UA |
| dc.description.sponsorship | публічного права | uk_UA |
| dc.language.iso | other | uk_UA |
| dc.publisher | Видавничий дім «Гельветика» | uk_UA |
| dc.subject | екологічний конфлікт, медіація, альтернативне вирішення спорів, критерії медіабельності | uk_UA |
| dc.title | Медіація як спосіб врегулювання екологічних конфліктів | uk_UA |
| dc.title.alternative | MEDIATION AS A WAY TO RESOLVE THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONFLICTS | uk_UA |
| dc.type | Article | uk_UA |
