Determinants of Typical Errors in Interpretation of ECHR Provisions in the Jurisprudence of Ukraine.
Переглянути
Дата
2021-02-09Автор
Карвацька, Світлана Богданівна
Metadata
Показати повний опис матеріалуКороткий опис(реферат)
The article will examine the determinants of typical errors in the
interpretation of ECHR provisions in the jurisprudence of Ukraine. It will prove that the
ratification of the ECHR by Ukraine has begun the process of changing the dominant
positivist paradigm of law, which has led to the emergence of legal theory and the
implementation of the necessary for the further development of pluralism. At the same
time, such a process immediately provoked lively discussions around the problem of
interpreting the content of the requirements laid down in the Convention. Nevertheless,
the problem is that there is no consensus among researchers on understanding the
general question of the place of ECHR decisions in the Council of Europe member
state’s internal legal system. It can be stated that in the analyzed cases, the Ukrainian
courts have interpreted the same ECtHR decision differently, resulting in a violation
of one of the conceptual principles - the unity of interpretation and unambiguous
application of ECtHR practice. It will be substantiated that a totality of these points
leads to a logical conclusion. Despite the legislative consolidation of the status of
ECtHR decisions as a source of law in Ukraine, the factors hampering the proper
application of ECtHR practices are the lack of a systematic and valid methodology
for formulating and motivating court decisions using an effective interpretative
interpretation ECtHR regarding specific decisions.