COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EVOLUTION OF ATTENTIONAL ABILITIES IN TWO CLASSES FROM PRIMARY CYCLE IN WHICH CHESS IS STUDIED
Переглянути
Дата
2022Автор
Stegariu, V.I.
Abalașei, B.A.
Hakman, A.V.
Medvid, A.M.
Metadata
Показати повний опис матеріалуКороткий опис(реферат)
Chess is an extremely simple game because
the general rules are well defined and during a
tournament nobody can interfere in one’s game.
Besides this, due to the fact that a game of
chess is played under time pressure, he must
evaluate the position precisely in a very short
amount of time. Every cognitive skill required
in a professional chess game likely transfers
to other related fields where comprehension,
analysis, memory, attention and evaluation of
complex phenomena is required. Chess requires
cognitive abilities and sophisticated problemsolving skills, thus providing a good opportunity
to study the mechanisms underlying cognitive
expertise. Researches have shown that during
a chess game the frontal and posterior parietal
area, which are specialized in orienting and
maintaining attention, perception and short-term
memory are used with predilection. Objective.
The objective of this research is to highlight how
chess practice influences the development of
specific skills so much needed to improve the
educational process. Methods of research.
In this experiment we observed the level of
attentional abilities of two classes in the primary
cycle who study chess as an optional subject.
The Kraepelin and Toulouse-Pieron tests were
used to quantify the level of students in the
two classes. These are the initial results that
will be completed by the final ones before the
end of the second semester. We tested 38 first
grade students from a school in Iași County.
They represent the collectives of two parallel
classes that study chess as an optional subject
for one hour each week. Both classes were
evenly matched, 19 children each, but their
composition differ. First class, named I A have
10 boys and 9 girls, meanwhile I D have 11 girls
and 8 boys. Results. The results recorded by
the two groups show similar values in both
tests. We used the independent sample t-test
to show that there are no statistically significant
differences. The dispersion of the results within
the groups presents the differences of the
characters of the two collectives